Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Terrell v. Warden, USP Florence ADMAX
as 1:2023cv01298
Petitioner:
Brooks James Terrell
Respondent:
Warden, USP Florence ADMAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shaw v. Warden USP Florence
as 1:2021cv00616
Respondent:
Warden USP Florence
Petitioner:
Norman Shaw, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
LaPointe v. Oliver, et al
as 19-3258
Respondent / Appellee:
DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas and JOHN OLIVER, Warden, USP Florence-High
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACK R. LAPOINTE
Burch v. Warden, USP Florence
as 5:2018cv00512
Respondent:
Warden, USP Florence
Petitioner:
Petrick Burch and Petrick Leevon Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hughes v. Oliver
as 14-1297
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY LOUIS HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN OLIVER, Warden, USP Florence-High
Gravley v. Warden
as 1:2013cv01346
Petitioner:
Dwaune J. Gravley, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden, USP Florence ADMAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthew Descamps v. Bush
as 11-6852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW R. DESCAMPS
Defendant - Appellee:
BUSH, BOP, WARDEN ZYCH, USP Lee, WARDEN, USP Florence and others
Descamps v. Bush et al
as 7:2011cv00251
Defendant:
W. Anders, Bush, SIS Lts. Florence and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Descamps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ozsusamlar v. Warden, USP Florence High
as 1:2011cv04035
Plaintiff:
Osman N. Ozsusamlar
Defendant:
Warden, USP Florence High
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. Daniels, et al
as 11-1170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSIEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANIELS, Warden, USP Florence, "John Doe #1," Special Investigations Agent, USP Florence, "John Doe #2," Special Investigations Specialist, USP Florence, L.J. MILUSNIC, Assistant Warden, ADX Florence and D. SPROUL, Step-Down Program Unit Manager, ADX Florence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
