Cases 31 - 40 of 97,173
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 24-6407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Defendant:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, JONATHAN FRAME, AWS, ANDY MITCHELL and others
Keith Pippins, Jr. v. Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
as 24-3374
Petitioner:
KEITH J. PIPPINS, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Nelson Wesley v. Cuyahoga County, OH Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-3376
Plaintiff:
NELSON ROY WESLEY
Defendant:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CLIFFORD PINKNEY, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH CORRECTIONS CENTER and others
Clarence Jenkins, Jr. v. Sherman Campbell
as 24-1382
Petitioner:
CLARENCE REED JENKINS, JR.
Respondent:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
Anthony McKinney v. Denise Paddock, et al
as 24-3375
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
DENISE PADDOCK, Librarian c/o at LOCI, in their individual and official capacity, LIEUTENANT R. KAMMER, at LOCI in their individual and official capacity, LIEUTENANT SHAWN FRYE, at LOCI in their individual and official capacity and others
Gerald Locke, Sr. v. Brent Fluke, Warden, et al
as 24-1920
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General of South Dakota
Jamarces Watson v. Brian Eller
as 24-5425
Petitioner:
JAMARCES JAJUAN WATSON
Respondent:
BRIAN ELLER, Warden
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03272
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babeneau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
