Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Winston v. Deputy Warden M. Auger et al
as 1:2015cv00204
Plaintiff:
John F. Winston
Defendant:
Deputy Warden M. Auger, Lieutenant Oden, Lieutenant Brek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00529
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee
Defendant:
A. T. Wall, Max Lt. Oden, Max Captain Aceto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petaway v. Porter et al
as 1:2013cv00794
Plaintiff:
William Petaway
Defendant:
Porter, C.O. Blain, Moson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Benbow v. Weeden et al
as 1:2013cv00334
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benbow
Defendant:
Warden Weeden, Lt. Alves, C/O Grandpre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins-Sanchez v. Wall et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Frank Collins-Sanchez
Defendant:
A.T. Wall, David McCauley, Warden Weeden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Wall et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Tristian Walker
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, II, Lt. Anthony Aceto, CO Chris Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Letourneau v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00848
Plaintiff:
Devon Letourneau
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, A. T. Wall, Warden McCauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wyatt Detention Facility et al
as 1:2012cv00684
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Donald W Wyatt Detention Facility and Warden Murph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. C/O Montecalvo et al
as 1:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
Donnell Greene
Defendant:
C/O Montecalvo, Warden Weeden, Lt. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. AT Wall et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
AT Wall, Warden McCauley, Michael Fine, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
