Cases 1 - 10 of 438
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden William Gittere, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins and Tony
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meas v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meals and Jerry Meas
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sorrick
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Agualar Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Raul Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smtih v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
James Smtih
Defendant:
Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
