Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Rivers v. Warner Brothers Media Corporation
as 3:2024cv07675
Defendant: Warner Brothers Media Corporation
Plaintiff: Monique Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mel MarinIn re: Mel Marin
as 24-3064
Respondent: JUAN R. SANCHEZ, WPVI TV 6 ABC, WARNER BROTHERS DISCOVERY, AS ALTER EGO OF CNN and others
Petitioner: In re: MEL M. MARIN
Mel Marin v. WPVI-TV/6ABC, et al
as 24-2891
Defendant: WALT DISNEY CO, AS ALTER EGO OF ABC, WARNER BROTHERS DISCOVERY, AS ALTER EGO OF CNN, CABLE NEWS NETWORK and others
Plaintiff: MEL M. MARIN
Notz v. Nathanson et al
as 5:2024cv00514
Defendant: Tavares Courthouse, Leesburg Police Dept., Rebecca Nathanson and others
Plaintiff: Arthur M Notz, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARIN v. WPVI-TV/6ABC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv04594
Defendant: JEFFREY ROSEN, WARNER BROTHERS DISCOVERY, INC., THE CABLE NEWS NETWORK and others
Plaintiff: MEL MARIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Armstrong v. WB Studio Enterprises, Inc., et al.
as 24-5049
Defendant: WARNER BROTHERS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and WB STUDIO ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff: BRIAN ARMSTRONG
Van Huisen v. Warner Brothers, et al.
as 24-4017
Plaintiff: GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant: WARNER BROTHERS, Time Warner and LEONARDO DICAPRIO
Van Huisen v. Warner Brothers, et al.
as 24-964
Plaintiff: GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant: WARNER BROTHERS, Time Warner and LEONARDO DICAPRIO
(PC) Van Huisen v. Warner Brothers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant: Warner Brothers and Leonardo DiCaprio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03526
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?