Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ISAKSEN v. MARINO et al
as 3:2023cv21177
Plaintiff:
ELISA-MARIE ISAKSEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MARINO, PHILLIPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROSSNAGLE'S SERVICE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BET v. WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv02368
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BET
Defendant:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and P/O DANIEL DIETER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vito Pecoraro v. Township of Washington, et al
as 21-1987
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON and OFFICER VINCENT SANTA, Officer of the Washington Township Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VITO PECORARO
STAPLEY v. N.J. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2020cv02344
Defendant:
JULES ROSCIOLI, GEICO INSURANCE CO., WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE I. STAPLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3322
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3323
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3227
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3228
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
MORIARTY v. DIBUONAVENTURA, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv02492
Plaintiff:
PAUL D. MORIARTY
Defendant:
PTL. JOSEPH DIBUONAVENTURA, WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOES 1 TO 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COONS v. KIRWIN et al
as 1:2008cv01926
Plaintiff:
WAYNE P. COONS
Defendant:
MICHELE M. KIRWIN, LAWRENCE JOHNSON, FRED LAST and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
