Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Charles v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service Inc.
as 3:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
Wayne Charles
Defendant:
Imperial Guard & Detective Service Inc.
Intervenor:
Allied Universal & XL America, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10973
Plaintiff:
Wayne Charles Adams
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Wayne Tretter v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50777
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE CHARLES TRETTER
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Tretter v. Davis
as 5:2017cv00519
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Wayne Charles Tretter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tretter v. McGinty et al
as 5:2013cv00408
Defendant:
Mary Green and Judge Angus McGinty
Plaintiff:
Wayne Charles Tretter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogg v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Wayne Charles Hogg
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hogg v. Woodall et al
as 1:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
Wayne Charles Hogg
Defendant:
Travis Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogg v. Woodall et al
as 2:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Wayne Charles Hogg
Defendant:
Ron Woodall, Mississippi Department of Corrections, April Meggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogg v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
Wayne Charles Hogg
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Comeaux et al v.Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01787
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Comeaux, Arthur Lee, Charlex Duhon and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C, Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C and Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
