Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5100
Plaintiff / Appellee: GABRIEL BISER, an individual, UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH MONASTERY STOREHOUSE, a Washington non-profit corporation and ERIN PATTERSON, an individual
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM F. KNOWLES, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Hamilton County, TN, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, NEAL PINKSTON, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Hamilton County, TN and others
Defendant / Appellee: BILL LEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5055
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Plaintiff / Appellee: TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: ELAINE ANDERSON, in her official capacity as County Clerk of Williamson County, TN
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5057
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Plaintiff / Appellee: TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: LISA DUKE CROWELL, in her official capacity as County Clerk of Rutherford County, TN
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors
as 21-5059
Plaintiff / Appellee: TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5058
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Plaintiff / Appellee: TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM F. KNOWLES, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Hamilton County, TN
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5048
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Defendant / Appellant: HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, JENNINGS H. JONES, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Rutherford County, TN, KIM R. HELPER, in her official capacity as District Attorney General for Rutherford County, TN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 19-6217
Defendant / Appellant: NEAL PINKSTON, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Hamilton County, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, BILL LEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee and others
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS
Plaintiff / Appellee: GALE PLUMM, a married couple, TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual and others
Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse et al v. Nabors et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00049
Plaintiff: Erin Patterson, Gabriel Biser, Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse and others
Defendant: Wayne Nabors, Lisa Duke Crowell, William K. Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery Nabors v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-10386
Petitioner / Appellant: JEFFERY WAYNE NABORS
Respondent / Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Nabors v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2016cv00010
Petitioner: Jeffery Wayne Nabors
Respondent: Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?