Cases 1 - 10 of 403
Thomas v. Pizarro et al
as 1:2023cv10159
Plaintiff:
Terence Thomas personally known as DJ Master Tee doing business as Master Lab Publishing
Defendant:
Tony D Pizarro, Interscope Records, Inc., WB Music Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Julius Johnson v. Onika Tanya Miraj et al
as 2:2023cv05061
Plaintiff:
Julius Johnson
Defendant:
Onika Tanya Miraj, Universal Music Group Inc., Songs of Universal Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
International Manufacturing Concepts Inc. v. Justin Bieber et al
as 2:2022cv02650
Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp. a California corporation doing business as WC Music Corp. formerly known as WB Music Corp., Justin Bieber, Dan Smyers and others
Plaintiff:
International Manufacturing Concepts Inc. a Nevada corporation doing business as Melomega Music doing business as Sound Gems
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
WB Music Corp., et al v. Royce Intl. Broadcasting Corp., et al
as 21-55264
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HI MOM I DIT IT, EMI APRIL MUSIC INC., DIVINE MILL MUSIC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOLDEN STATE BROADCASTING, ROYCE INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING CORPORATION, PLAYA DEL SOL BROADCASTERS and others
Receiver:
W. LAWRENCE PATRICK
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff:
Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant:
Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent:
MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae:
Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor:
Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
BCS Computers LLC
Special Master:
Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pascal Languirand v. W Chappell Music Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv05725
Plaintiff:
Pascal Languirand
Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp. a California corporation doing business as WB Music Corp. doing business as WB Music Corp., Unidisc Music Inc. a Canadian corporation doing business as Unitunes Music doing business as Unitunes Music, W Chappell Music Corp. a California corporation doing business as WB Music Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent:
Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party:
MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
International Manufacturing Concepts Inc. v. Bieber et al
as 2:2022cv02632
Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp. a California corporation doing business as WC Music Corp. formerly known as WB Music Corp., Justin Bieber, Dan Smyers and others
Plaintiff:
International Manufacturing Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wilson et al v. Ronson et al
as 4:2021cv00413
Defendant:
Nicholaus Williams, Jamareo Artis, Mark Daniel Ronson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie James Wilson, Robin Lynn Wilson, LaTina Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Copeland et al v. Bieber et al
as 2:2013cv00246
Defendant:
Ray Romulus also known as Rayro doing business as Please Enjoy the Music, Stage Three Music, LLC, Justin Bieber and others
Plaintiff:
Mareio Overton and Devin Copeland
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
