Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Boyd v. Rockstrem et al
as 2:2026cv00304
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Christopher Boyd
Defendant:
Alex Rockstrem, Jennifer Gonzolez, WCC Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
E3 OMI, LLC v. WCC Energy Group, LLC
as 3:2026cv00029
Plaintiff:
E3 OMI, LLC
Defendant:
WCC Energy Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
7 Long Fishery LLC et al v. Hilcorp Energy Co et al
as 4:2025cv03725
Plaintiff:
7 Long Fishery LLC, A.P. Trawlers, Inc., Abrego Trawlers, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hilcorp Energy Co and WCC Energy Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allah v. Lang, et al.
as 25-3146
Plaintiff:
ALLAH ALLAH, SP/C, 5% Nation of Islam and Edwin Randal Coston
Defendant:
TIM LANG, Secretary of DOC, DEAN MASON, Superintendent of WCC and JANE WOOD, WCC Records
Allah v. Mason
as 25-2877
Petitioner:
ALLAH ALLAH and Edwin Randal Coston
Respondent:
DEAN MASON, d.b.a. Sup. of WCC
Allah v. Lang et al
as 1:2025cv01431
Plaintiff:
Allah
Defendant:
Tim Lang doing business as Sec. of DOC, Dean Mason doing business as Sup. of WCC and Jane Wood etal doing business as WCC Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weldeyohannes v. State of Washington, et al.
as 24-3821
Defendant:
STEPHEN VERES, STATE OF WASHINGTON, JOHN LEE, Sergeant, Washington Corrections Center and others
Plaintiff:
MUSSIE E. WELDEYOHANNES
Thompson v. Febvre
as 24-181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL K. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY LEE FEBVRE, Alaska DOC Mailroom Officer at WCC
Johnson v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Johnson
Defendant:
Gason English, Aramark, Indiana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. WCC et al
as 1:2023cv03155
Plaintiff:
Juan Gonzalez
Defendant:
WCC and YCDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
