Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Long v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Weeks Long
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Weeks et al v. Matrix Absence Management Incorporated
as 2:2020cv00884
Defendant:
Matrix Absence Management Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald, Tina Weeks and Cassandra Magdaleno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05824
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weeks v. Titlemax of Arizona Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv05788
Defendant:
Metro Auto Recovery LLC and Titlemax of Arizona Incorporated
Plaintiff:
John Weeks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Garner v. Buckeye, City of et al
as 2:2019cv01453
Defendant:
Eduardo Cruz, Unknown Weeks, Lodgepros Buckeye LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Theresa Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weeks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00883
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Weeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weeks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01716
Plaintiff:
Colli Weeks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Auguste v. Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Bernard Auguste
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services, Unknown Party, Unknown Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeks v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02283
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Weeks
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tigrent Incorporated v. Weeks et al
as 2:2014cv00660
Defendant:
Darren Weeks and Rich Dad: Global Entrepreneurs Organization
Plaintiff:
Tigrent Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
