Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Franklyn v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2014cv10943
Plaintiff:
Kevin Franklyn
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , National Asset Advisors, LLC, Harbour Portfolio VI, LP and others
Taylor v. Weltman, Weinburg & Reis, Co. PSC
as 3:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
Zachory Taylor
Defendant:
Weltman, Weinburg & Reis, Co. PSC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOPSON v. BERRY et al
as 4:2013cv00045
Defendant:
BENNY BERRY, CHARLIE CUNNINGHAM, DENETRA GATES and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hopson v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Charlie Cunningham, CPS Louisville, Judge Gerber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Spencer et al
as 3:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Spencer, Judge Collins, Susan Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Hopson et al
as 3:2012cv00832
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Goverment of Kentucky, Robert Klienfield, Adam Solinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Weinburg et al
as 3:2012cv00802
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Weinburg, Adam Solinger, Susan Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Aguair Law Office et al
as 3:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Aguair Law Office, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Weinburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Weinburg et al
as 3:2012cv00772
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
David Weinburg, Weinburg, Simpson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hopson v. Aguair Law Office et al
as 3:2012cv00771
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Aguair Law Office, Adam Solinger, Weinburg Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
