Cases 31 - 35 of 35
Purisima v. Wachovia et al
as 1:2010cv07299
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Wachovia, Wells Fargo Bank, Wells Fargo Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrett, et al v. Cook, et al
as 10-2214
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT GARRETT and PAMELA JANE GARRETT
Plaintiff:
WHEELER PEAK CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL W. COOK, individually and as a member of the Board of Directors of Trenchless Infrastructure Technolologies, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NEW MEXICO, N.A., successor to Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico and WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
CATHERINE F. DAVIS, TRENCHLESS INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES INC., FKA Hydroscope Group Inc., AKA Hydroscope Integrated Technologies, Inc. A Nevada Corporation, KENNETH A. HUNT, individually and others
Garrett, et al v. Cook, et al
as 10-2207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT GARRETT, PAMELA JANE GARRETT and WHEELER PEAK CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL W. COOK, individually and as a member of the Board of Directors of Trenchless Infrastructure Technolologies, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NEW MEXICO, N.A., successor to Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico and WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
TRENCHLESS INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES INC., FKA Hydroscope Group Inc., AKA Hydroscope Integrated Technologies, Inc. A Nevada Corporation, YOLANDA COOK, individually, WILLIAM F. HARTMAN, Dr., as a member of the Board of Directors of Trenchless Infrastructure Technologies, Inc. and others
Lustgarten v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 1:2010cv10999
Plaintiff:
Stewart J Lustgarten
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wachovia Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gully v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 4:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Kamesha Gully and Kamesha Gully
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
