Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Westfall v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv15952
Plaintiff:
Anne Westfall
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Sherry Benton, Margaret Madole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westfall v. Austin et al
as 3:2022cv03077
Petitioner:
Christopher T Westfall
Respondent:
Austin
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westfall v. Austin et al
as 1:2022cv01776
Petitioner:
Christopher T Westfall
Respondent:
Austin and Attorney General of the state of Sangamon County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNES v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARNES
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, OGLESBY, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv01286
Defendant:
Bill Westfall, Anthony Wills, Alex Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Tucker Westfall et al v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00608
Plaintiff:
Dale Westfall, Tracy Westfall and Estate of Tucker Westfall
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc., ABC Company and DEF Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taplin, Jr. v. Watson et al
as 3:2019cv01123
Defendant:
J. Loche, Price, Counselor Inbaden and others
Plaintiff:
Enos F. Taplin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Mears et al
as 3:2019cv00799
Defendant:
J. Shemedy, C/O Hanson, Susan Kirk and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
