Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Westfall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01817
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Westfall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02771
Plaintiff:
Jackie Westfall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez Arredondo et al v. Westfall Masonry, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02370
Plaintiff:
Efrain Ramirez Arredondo and Mario Gustavo Ramirez Arredondo
Defendant:
Westfall Masonry, Inc. and Andrew Westfall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Westfall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01807
Plaintiff:
Danny Westfall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01261
Plaintiff:
Charlotte L. Westfall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfall-Villasenor v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00956
Plaintiff:
Cynthia J. Westfall-Villasenor
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00951
Plaintiff:
Betty I. Westfall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfall v. USA
as 1:2014cv00188
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shea Westfall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hines v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hines
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Kimberley Jacobs, Richard Bash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westfall et al v. Ironton Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 1:2012cv00866
Plaintiff:
Alma Sue Westfall and Timothy Westfall
Defendant:
Ironton Metropolitan Housing Authority and West End Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
