Cases 81 - 90 of 674
Talley v. Wexford Medical Director of IDOC et al
as 1:2021cv01047
Defendant:
Teri Kennedy, Glendal French, Andrew Tilden and others
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUZIER v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCE et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, JANE DOE, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brice Price v. Putnamville Correctional Facil, et al
as 21-1163
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE DEE, OFFICER TOLBERT, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRICE PRICE
HANDLEY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, DUAN PEARCE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HANDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus Jr v. Nurse Bozena et al
as 1:2021cv00368
Defendant:
Hopskin, Nurse Bozena, Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Perkins Rufus Jr and Keith Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faison v. G.K. Fountain Atmore, AL et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Mrs. Simmons, Ms. Adams, G.K. Fountain Atmore, AL and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney P. Faison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2021cv00013
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, KENNY MITCHELL, J. MANUEL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCants v. Carter et al
as 3:2020cv01055
Plaintiff:
Keith R McCants and Keith Rene McCants
Defendant:
Sgt. A Lagunas, Ron Neal, Wexford Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Roy v. Kay Ivy, et al
as 20-14761
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON DUNN, KAY IVY and WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY LARRY and LARRY ROY
Lamarr Crittenden v. Bruce Ippel, et al
as 20-3479
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, HEATHER DAVIS, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES OF INDIANA L.L.C and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMARR T. CRITTENDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
