Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anthony Jennings v. Colin Ottey
as 15-7194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY O. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR COLIN OTTEY, GREG FLURY, WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES and others
Defendant:
WARDEN FRANK BISHOP
Lattisaw v. E.C.I. Prison et al
as 1:2015cv02040
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lattisaw
Defendant:
E.C.I. Prison, Wexford Medical Source, Inc., Ruth Pinkney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonaparte v. Wexford Medical Sources Inc et al
as 8:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bonaparte
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Sources Inc and PA Storm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Wood v. Jim Rubenstein
as 15-6014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIAM WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM RUBENSTEIN, MARVIN C. PLUMLEY, THOMAS HARLAN, Capt. and others
Defendant:
NURSE, on Duty July 31, 2012 (P.M. Shift, Name unknown), TRISTEN TENNEY and WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES
Wood v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Wood
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Marvin C. Plumley, Thomas Harlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. Fox et al
as 2:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Arthur
Defendant:
William Fox, Vickie Gheen, Paul Modie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pannell v. Proctor et al
as 2:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Pannell
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor, Tristen Tenny and Wexford Medical Sources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Ojeda v. Dr. Procter
as 11-6801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN OJEDA
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. PROCTER, sued individually and as an Agent of Wexford Medical Sources, TRISTEN TENNY, sued individually and as Agent of Wexford Medical Resources, ADRIAN HOKE, sued individually and in his Official Capacity and others
Ojeda v. Procter et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ojeda
Defendant:
Dr. Procter, Tristen Tenny, Adrian Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
