Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Normand v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2018ct03037
Petitioner:
Otto Gary Normand
Respondent:
Chloe Anne Reynolds, Kristen W. Peebles, T. Allen Buzzy Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORMAND v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
OTTO GARY NORMAND
Defendant:
CHLOE ANNE REYNOLDS, KRISTEN W. PEEBLES, T. ALLEN "BUZZY&quo GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORMAND v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
OTTO GARY NORMAND
Defendant:
CHLOE ANNE REYNOLDS, KRISTEN W. PEEBLES, T. ALLEN "BUZZY&quo GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. USA
as 7:2017cv00234
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shawnee Otto Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Otto Container Management, LLC, v. Greenkraft, Inc
as 3:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Otto Container Management, LLC
Defendant:
Greenkraft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Normand v. Wells
as 5:2014hc02256
Petitioner:
Otto Gary Normand
Respondent:
B. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Normand v. Cooper et al
as 5:2013hc02131
Petitioner:
Otto Gary Normand
Respondent:
Roy Cooper and Kristen N. Peebles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Normand v. Reynolds
as 5:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
Otto Gary Normand
Defendant:
Chloe Ann Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
