Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hart v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Monroe Hart
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
LAMB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09877
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CHARLES HART LAMB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Empey et al v. C R England, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00815
Plaintiff:
Sharron Empey and Delaney Empey
Defendant:
C R England, Inc. , Jonathan M. Reyes , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01326
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Hart and William J. Hart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon's Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart et al v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Hart and William J. Hart
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hart et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Hart and William J. Hart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon's Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21163
Plaintiff:
Arzell Sue Hart and William D. Hart, Sr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIDDENS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as 2:2010cv64321
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY HART and WILLIAM THOMAS HART
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HART et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66562
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS HART and SHIRLEY HART
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
