Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Newton v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv03063
Petitioner:
Sye Newton and Sye C.R. Newton
Respondent:
Senior Warden Joe Smith, Attorney General William Barr and Donald W Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parker v. US Marshals Service et al
as 3:2020cv02465
Defendant:
US Marshalls, Attorney General Of the US, Warden - FCI Aliceville and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy B Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin-Bey v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2020cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Duane Irvin-Bey and Jermaine Duane Irvin
Defendant:
Joshua Burgess, Nancy Pelosi, House of Representatives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerr v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv01023
Respondent:
William Barr and Chad Wolf
Petitioner:
Kwesi Omari Kerr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mesquias v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00115
Respondent:
Director of U. S. Ma Donald Washington, Attorney General William Barr, Warden Frank Luna and others
Petitioner:
Rodney Mesquias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bouterse v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Paula A. Wolff, Archie B. Longley, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Dino Delano Bouterse
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Attorney Fred A. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerome v. Barr
as 3:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
Peterson Jerome
Defendant:
William Barr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hernandez v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00150
Defendant:
William Barr and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Ana Belia Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawkes v. Barr
as 3:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
James Hawkes
Defendant:
U.S. Atty General William Barr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
