Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00054
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00047
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00021
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alvarez v. McAleenan et al
as 5:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SHAWN GILLIS and others
Plaintiff:
Josep Ramirez Alvarez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Defendant:
Interim Assistant Thomas R. Kane, Attorney General William Barr, Interim Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00108
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hashim v. Barr
as 5:2019cv00077
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Muhammad Hashim
Defendant:
William Barr
Respondent:
Warden Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
