Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Michael Markowitz v. William Nicholson, et al
as 23-1691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MARKOWITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, CHCA, ROBERT GILMORE, Former Superintendent, JAMES FETTERMAN, CRNP and others
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICAHEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ENOXH V HICE ET AL
as 2:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
REV. AUGUSTUS SIMMONS ENOXH
Defendant:
M. HICE, COULEHAN, LT. TROUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Rambert v. Tracy Shawley, et al
as 22-1138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY SHAWLEY, Grievance Coordinator, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, Health Care Administrator and MARK HAMMER, Physician Assistant
VO v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2021cv01621
Plaintiff:
THUY VAN VO
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, MICHAEL HICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RAMBERT v. SHAWLEY et al
as 2:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
TRACY SHAWLEY, NICHOLSON, HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00343
Defendant:
C/O 2 HARAUSE, C/O1 JEREMIAH LEWIS, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAJOR v. HALLIGAN et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, PAUL ENNIS, ERICSON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LAYTON v. SMYTH et al
as 2:2020cv00519
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. DENISE SMYTH, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
