Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Bass et al v. KZRV, LP et al
as 2:2009cv08393
Plaintiff: Kevin Bass, Kevin Bass, Kevin Bass and others
Defendant: KZRV, LP, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
William Pierce Earley v. Licoln Electric Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-71090
Defendant: Licoln Electric Co
Plaintiff: William Pierce Earley
JORDAN v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv73275
Plaintiff: OLEN LAVOYN JORDAN, CLARENCE JACKSON ALLDREDGE, EUNICE HYDE BAILEY and others
Defendant: LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, BOC GROUP, INC. and others
Petitioner: LANDY DELMAR ALDRIDGE and ROOSEVELT ALTOMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
PIERCE v. SMEAL et al
as 2:2009cv02338
Petitioner: WILLIAM PIERCE
Respondent: PAUL K. SMEAL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Pierce Plummer v. Kerry Harrington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03031
Petitioner: William Pierce Plummer
Respondent: Kerry Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Pierce v. A-bex Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-73368
Plaintiff: William Pierce
Defendant: A-bex Corporation
In re: William Plummer
as 08-80134
Respondent: In re: WILLIAM PIERCE PLUMMER
William Plummer v. USA, et al
as 08-16821
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM PIERCE PLUMMER
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ATTORNEY GENERAL
William Plummer v. Warden
as 08-15980
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM PIERCE PLUMMER
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARD J. CADEN
Pierce v. Nilamdeen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008mc00007
Plaintiff: Patrick William Pierce, II
Defendant: Mohamed Nilamdeen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?