Cases 41 - 50 of 19,386
Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin CassadayIn re: Kevin Cassaday
as 24-1414
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smart v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
William Smart
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCracken v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
William McCracken
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Raphael Williams, Jr.
as 24-1409
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAPHAEL JERMAINE WILLIAMS, JR.
Whatley v. Lape et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Perry Lee Whatley and Pairi Omari Will El Rey
Defendant:
Kathleen Lape, Douglas Ullrich, Dennis Alerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Ferraro et al
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Ohio Security Insurance Company
Defendant:
William Ferraro, Amy Ferraro, Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Gonsalves v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
William Gonsalves
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
