Cases 31 - 40 of 4,140
Florence v. Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Derrick Florence
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department, Officer Payne, Officer Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Killian v. Cogdill et al
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Willie James Killian
Defendant:
William Claude Cogdill, Jr, Titus Transport Holding LLC and Hogan Truck Leasing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Knox et al
as 7:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Aline H Williams
Defendant:
Jessie Knox, Deb Knox, Franderick Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
William Roberts and Sydnee Roberts
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. HUD and Prichard Housing Authority
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
William J. Mitchell
Defendant:
HUD and Prichard Housing Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
