Cases 31 - 40 of 3,939
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Daniels v. USA
as 5:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
William Isaac Daniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bardge v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
William Alvin Bardge
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Donail Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024hc02048
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBold v. Stocks et al
as 5:2024ct03054
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. DeBold
Defendant:
Sergeant Stocks, C/O Williams, C/O Everrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DODSON et al v. WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
JOHN DODSON, SCOTT TURNER, JOSEPH GALLAGHER and others
Defendant:
WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. and JONATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Price v. Atrium Health et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Atrium Health, Southern Health Partners, Ashley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. McMahon et al
as 5:2024ct03053
Plaintiff:
Harold Boyd, Jr
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, Major Price, Batman Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brammer
as 5:2024ct03051
Plaintiff:
Quashon Treyvaughn Williams
Defendant:
Officer Brammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
