Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Barnes v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Tatonia Barnes
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama Department of Corrections Central Records Department Of Montgomery AL, USA Medical Center Hospital Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dailey v. Cook et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Marlon J. Dailey
Defendant:
Willie Knight, Kimberly Grace, Mary Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckhalter v. Cook et al
as 1:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Lt. White, Willie Knight, Mary Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Buckhalter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Cook et al
as 1:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Lt. Wright, Monica MaCoy, Willie Knight and others
Plaintiff:
Sedric A. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Cooks et al
as 1:2019cv00944
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Mary Cooks, Warden Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charest v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2018cv00297
Defendant:
Capt. Willie Knight, State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Charest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucy v. Norman et al
as 1:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
William Neal Lucy
Defendant:
Lt. Angela Norman and Capt. Willie Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charest v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Charest
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucy v. Norman et al
as 2:2018cv00374
Plaintiff:
William Neal Lucy
Defendant:
Angela Norman and Willie Knight
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley, Robert Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
