Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Librace v. Simpson
as 7:2023cv01613
Plaintiff:
David Librace
Defendant:
Wilton Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZACK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHEN et al v. SIMPSON et al
as 4:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
YIFAN SHEN, ZHIMING XU, XINXI WANG and others
Defendant:
WILTON SIMPSON, MEREDITH IVEY, PATRICIA FITZGERALD and others
Amicus Curiae:
FRED T KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY AT SEATTLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION LAW POLICY AND JUSTICE AT RUTGERS LAW SCHOOL, AOKI CENTER FOR CRITICAL RACE AND NATION STUDIES AT UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
BARWICK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
DARRYL BRYAN BARWICK
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COMMON CAUSE FLORIDA et al v. LEE et al
as 5:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE FLORIDA, FairDistricts now, Dorothy Inman-Johnson and others
Defendant:
LAUREL M LEE, WILTON SIMPSON, CHRIS SPROWLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COMMON CAUSE FLORIDA et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE FLORIDA, FAIRDISTRICTS NOW, DOROTHY INMAN-JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL M LEE, WILTON SIMPSON, CHRIS SPROWLS and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ARTEAGA, LENI FERNANDEZ, ANDREA HERSHORIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STONE et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2020cv00568
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, RONALD DESANTIS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STONE, PATTY REID, MARIA GLORIA ROMERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
