Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Wolfe v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Stanley N. Wolfe
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc., 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund et al v. IES, LLC et al
as 0:2023mc00094
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund, National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Fund, National Elevator Industry Educational Fund and others
Defendant:
IES, LLC, Wolfe Clark and Raymond Kuntz
Holmes v. Centurion of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Centurion of Minnesota, MN DOC, State of MN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Minnesota DOC et al
as 0:2023cv02969
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Minnesota DOC, State of MN, Joan Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
von Brandenfels v. LTL LED, LLC
as 0:2023cv02813
Plaintiff:
Alexander von Brandenfels
Defendant:
LTL LED, LLC doing business as Wolf River Electric
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mullins v. Morgan et al
as 0:2023cv01855
Plaintiff:
Gary Mullins, Jr
Defendant:
Dr. Morgan, Dr. Jordan, Nurse Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OptumRX, Inc. v. Wolfe's Pharmacy
as 0:2023cv00826
Petitioner:
OptumRX, Inc.
Respondent:
Wolfe's Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Wolf et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 0:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Eliyahu Wolf and Miranda Phelps
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
