Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rueda v. Salem Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Ivan Cortes Rueda
Defendant:
Salem Hospital, Andrew J. Cleary, Corby W. Makin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Purtle et al
as 5:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Craig Reed
Defendant:
Cody Purtle, Judge FNU Woodburn and Judge Thomas Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Woodburn
as 2:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Abram Henry Rodriguez and Chris Rodriguez
Defendant:
Doug Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Woodburn ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO NDTX***
as 6:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Abram Henry Rodriguez
Defendant:
Doug Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Woodburn
as 2:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Abram Henry Rodriguez
Defendant:
Doug Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Brooks W Barfield, Douglas R Woodburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Woodburn et al
as 2:2021cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Douglas Woodburn, Randall Sims, Lynsie Brantly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00032
Respondent:
SCOTT CRICKMAR, Deputy Warden SHROPSHIRE, Deputy Warden MIMS and others
Petitioner:
RANDY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2020cv00188
Defendant:
DARREN JACKSON, SHAWN EMMONS, BRANDON SHARPE and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRADFORD LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortez v. Marion County Sheriffs Officers et al
as 6:2019cv02075
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Silva Cortez
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriffs Officers, Woodburn Police Department, Jason Bernards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
