Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Woodford et al
as 1:2026cv00466
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Daniel Woodford and Charles Triska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Woodford v. Ryan
as 2:2026cv13309
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dominic Woodford
Defendant:
Lacy Eryn Ryan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. Darryl Woodford
as 26-1568
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DARRYL DOMINIC WOODFORD
USA v. Darryl Woodford
as 26-1556
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DARRYL DOMINIC WOODFORD
TAYLOR v. WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES
as 1:2026cv00284
Plaintiff:
SHANNON TAYLOR
Defendant:
WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Toth v. Lloyd & McDaniel PLC et al.
as 3:2026cv01190
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Toth
Defendant:
Lloyd & McDaniel PLC, W. Anderson Woodford and Levy & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
BEAUDREAU v. WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES
as 1:2026cv00235
Plaintiff:
LISA BEAUDREAU
Defendant:
WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PARADIS v. WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES
as 2:2026cv00188
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY PARADIS
Defendant:
WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mpiana v. Woodford County State Attorney Office et al
as 1:2026cv01055
Petitioner:
Jonathan Mpiana
Respondent:
Woodford County State Attorney Office and Eric R Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Legacy Lifepoint Health, LLC et al v. Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00792
Plaintiff:
Legacy Lifepoint Health, LLC, Lifepoint Hospitals, Inc., Woodford Hospital, LLC and others
Defendant:
Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
