Cases 1 - 10 of 26
WOODWARD v. TIERNEY et al
as 2:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
CURTIS WADE WOODWARD
Defendant:
S. TIERNEY and C. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAY v. CRAIG et al
as 4:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R BAY
Defendant:
SAM CRAIG, BRANDON WOODWARD and MISTY ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WOODWARD v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL
as 2:2018cv00382
Petitioner:
CURTIS WOODWARD
Respondent:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coppage et al v. Crane 1 Services Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00290
Defendant:
Edmund Woodward, Brady Fincher and Crane 1 Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Sharon Coppage and Robert Coppage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODWARD v. MOORE
as 2:2018cv00299
Defendant:
DANIEL LEE MOORE
Plaintiff:
CURTIS WADE WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODWARD v. MOORE
as 2:2018cv00298
Defendant:
DANIEL LEE MOORE
Plaintiff:
CURTIS WADE WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
American United Life Insurance Company v. Woodward et al
as 2:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
American United Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
George R. Woodward, Jr., Robert Woodward, John A. Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
LEYBA et al v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
ACLU, ADMINISTRATOR, Commission on Civil Rights and others
Defendant:
JEN COTTER, JANE/JOHN DOES, JUDGE JEROME FRESA and others
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leyba et al v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Erwin Leyba, Wendy Zultanski - Leyba, Corey Nicholas Smolka Leyba and others
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Ind Parole Board / Agents, Ken Cotter and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
