Cases 31 - 40 of 107
The Mills Corporation Securiti
as 10-1150
:
In re: THE MILLS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Appellant:
DANIEL ROCKER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff:
IRWIN BERLIN, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, VERNON E. RUDOLPH, FREDERIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - None:
KENNETH R. PARENT, NICHOLAS MCDONOUGH, JOHN M. INGRAM and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
JOHN J. MCAVOY
Appellee:
JEFFREY WARREN GOLAN, JEFFREY ALAN BARRACK, CHAD A. CARDER and others
Movant - None:
KANAM SERVICES L.P., KANAM MANAGEMENT LLC, KANAM PROVIDERS INCORPORATED and others
The Mills Corporation Securiti v. Kenneth Parent
as 10-1125
:
In re: THE MILLS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IRWIN BERLIN, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, VERNON E. RUDOLPH, FREDERIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD STANLEY, JOAN KLOC and MARVIN MINE
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH R. PARENT
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS MCDONOUGH, JOHN M. INGRAM, JOSEPH B. GILDENHORN and others
Defendant - None:
COLOMBE M. NICHOLAS, CHARLES R. BLACK, S. JOSEPH BRUNO and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
JOHN J. MCAVOY
Movant - None:
KANAM SERVICES L.P., KANAM MANAGEMENT LLC, KANAM PROVIDERS INCORPORATED and others
Montgomery v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00440
Plaintiff:
Denis Montgomery, Denis Montgomery and Denis Montgomery
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Kenneth D. Lewis, Joe L. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System v. Wachovia Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv08268
Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Capital Trust IV, Wachovia Capital Trust IX and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Swiskay et al v. Wachovia Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv06457
Plaintiff:
Michael Swiskay, Michael Swiskay, Norman Levin and others
Defendant:
Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Orange County Employees' Retirement System et al v. Carlson et al
as 1:2009cv06374
Plaintiff:
Orange County Employees' Retirement System, Orange County Employees' Retirement System, Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension and Relief Fund and others
Defendant:
Peter M. Carlson, Peter M. Carlson, Peter M. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Miller et al v. Wachovia Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv06351
Plaintiff:
Arlette Miller, Arlette Miller, Arlette Miller and others
Defendant:
Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc. v. Mudd
as 1:2009cv06102
Plaintiff:
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc., Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc. and Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel H. Mudd, Robert J. Levin, Stephen M. Swad and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
KIRSCHNER et al v. WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC et al
as 2:2009mc00162
Plaintiff:
MARC S. KIRSCHNER, COMPASS FINANCIAL CORPORATION and MB FINANCIAL BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. and others
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc. v. Mudd et al
as 4:2009cv01444
Plaintiff:
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel H. Mudd, Robert J. Levin, Stephen M. Swad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
