Cases 21 - 30 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cichosz et al v. Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency, Inc.
as 1:2022cv12984
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Cichosz, Ilene Fanzini, Angela Forsythe and others
Defendant:
Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Wakefield v. SIU Credit Union et al
as 3:2022cv01767
Defendant:
Deborah Wakefield, SIU Credit Union, Lisa and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ramirez et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022at00707
Plaintiff:
Francisco C Ramirez and Karen D Ramirez
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Beau E Parkhurst, Two Unknown Code Enforcement Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ramirez et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
Francisco C. Ramirez and Karen D. Ramirez
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Beau E. Parkhurst, Richard Leiker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
