Cases 11 - 20 of 774
Arnold v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bryan Arnold
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Talley v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shekena Talley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nancy Berumen v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Nancy Berumen
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Castro v. Wal-mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASTRO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Moeller v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tom Moeller
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 7:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Ke'Andre Demarcus Kennedy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Montgomery v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Tina Montgomery
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kirk v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gary Kirk
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Martha Moya v. WalMart Associates Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Martha Moya
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., Walmart Associates Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
RIVERS III v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2024cv02919
Plaintiff:
LOUIS N. RIVERS III
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
