Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wally Edgar Chevrolet Inc. v. Central Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv10105
Plaintiff:
Wally Edgar Chevrolet Inc.
Defendant:
Central Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nettles #271812 v. Wallis et al
as 2:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Macking Nettles #271812, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig Wallis, Unknown Gimple, Unknown Portice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahar v. Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of et al
as 2:2021cv11694
Plaintiff:
Wally S. Mahar
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of, Internal Revenue Service and Social Security Administration
Nettles #271812 v. Wallis et al
as 2:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Crystal Bigger, Unknown Portice, Craig Wallis and others
Plaintiff:
Macking Nettles #271812, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King #280752 v. Horton et al
as 2:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Unknown Wallis, Unknown Harrison, Unknown McLean and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Anthony King #280752
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #441652 v. Wallis
as 2:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson #441652
Defendant:
Unknown Wallis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moratorium Now! et al v. Detroit 300 Conservancy et al
as 2:2015cv10373
Plaintiff:
Moratorium Now! , Cheryl LaBash , Thomas Michalak and others
Defendant:
Detroit 300 Conservancy , Robert F. Gregory , Heather Badrak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelley #259579 v. Atkinson, et al
as 2:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Marcus Kelley #259579
Defendant:
Kimberly Atkinson, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Sariano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Atkinson
as 1:2014cv11894
Plaintiff:
Marcus Kelly
Defendant:
Kimberly Atkinson, LNU, Sariano and others
Moody et al v. Michigan Gaming Control Board et al
as 2:2012cv13593
Plaintiff:
John Moody , Donald Harmon , Rick Ray and others
Defendant:
Michigan Gaming Control Board , Richard Kalm , Gary Post and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
