Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-2206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hannah v. Walmart
as 18-2201
Plaintiff:
Tom Irving
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kim Hannah, Zena M. Irving, as personal representative of the estate of Tom Irving and Michael Barham
Defendant / Appellee:
Walmart Stores East, LP and Walmart Stores, Incorporated
Defendant:
Walmart
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-2201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hannah v. Walmart
as 18-2206
Appellant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and Walmart Stores, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kim Hannah, Tom Irving, Michael Barham and others
Defendant:
Walmart
Miller v. Annucci
as 18-1243
Plaintiff:
Mary Miller
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Miller, Eugene Randolph and Eugene Mazzio
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, NYSDOCCS, James A. O'Gorman, Acting Deputy commissioner, Thomas Griffin, Superintendent and others
Wilson v. Walmart Store Inc
as 17-1232
Petitioner:
Rasheen Wilson
Respondent:
Walmart Stores, Incorporated
Joshi v. Walmart Stores, Incorporated
as 16-3214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Satish Joshi and Usha Joshi
Defendant - Appellee:
Walmart Stores, Incorporated
Puckett v. Walmart Store #5823 et al
as 3:2015cv02029
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Puckett
Defendant:
Walmart Store #5823, Larry Moody, City of Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarence Jackson v. Walmart Stores, Incorporated
as 15-1997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WALMART STORES, INCORPORATED
Linda Hart v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 14-11328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA J. HART
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, NORDSTROM, NORDSTROM CREDIT SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
