Cases 1 - 10 of 801
Chandler v. Warden and Officers et al
as 7:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Chauncey D. Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Lt's., Warden and Officers, Mr. Tatum and Captain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Gonzalez et al
as 7:2024cv00646
Defendant:
Hearing Officer A.D. Gonzalez, Gregory Holloway, Lt. S. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louis v. Stearns et al
as 7:2024cv00621
Defendant:
Warden Stearns, Warden Buckle and Officer Wells
Plaintiff:
Kareem Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deans v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Donshea O. Deans, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark E. Engelke, R. Brock, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Artrip
as 7:2024cv00619
Respondent:
Warden Jeffery Artrip
Petitioner:
Aaron Randolph Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe #2, Correctional Officer Edwards, Nurse Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Jordan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washam v. Gulley
as 7:2024cv00610
Respondent:
Warden Gulley
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Washam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Leu et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Jane Doe 4, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Hosea Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Chandler v. Warden and Officers
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Chauncey D. Chandler
Defendant:
Warden and Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Defendant:
John Shoda, Counselor Jarrell, Reagan Coe and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
