Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tanniehill v. Colbert
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dewayne Tanniehill
Defendant:
Warden Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fowler v. Colbert
as 3:2023cv03112
Plaintiff:
Steven Fowler
Defendant:
Warden Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Colbert
as 3:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Raymon Marquell Harris
Defendant:
Warden Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gardner v. Warden Colbert - U.S.P. Yazoo City, MS et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Michael William Gardner
Defendant:
Warden Colbert - U.S.P. Yazoo City, MS and Bureau of Prisons (B.O.P.)
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Corey Thomas v. Colbert
as 23-15052
Petitioner / Appellant:
COREY J. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
COLBERT, First name unknown; named as Warden Colbert
SMITH v. EBBERT et al
as 2:2020cv01736
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and ASSISTANT WARDEN COLBERT
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McFee v. Colbert et al
as 5:2020cv00303
Plaintiff:
Richard McFee
Defendant:
Officer R. Oller, Lt. M. Barker, Officer R. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFee v. Colbert et al
as 5:2020cv00015
Defendant:
M. Barker, C. Williams, Officer R. Oller and others
Plaintiff:
Richard McFee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFee v. Colbert et al
as 3:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Officer R Oller, Officer R Wolf, Officer M Marinari and others
Plaintiff:
Richard McFee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv01301
Defendant:
J. Enigk, J. Konkle, Ian Connors and others
Debtor In Possession:
NRP M. Barner
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
