Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Harvey v. Ford et al
as 1:2022cv05141
Petitioner:
Michael Darnell Harvey
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Georgia and Warden Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ridley v. Ward et al
as 1:2022cv03507
Plaintiff:
Edward Tyrone Ridley
Defendant:
Commissioner Timothy Ward, Warden Lawrence Wittington, Warden Ford Jackson Diagnostic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN WILKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSS v. FORD et al
as 5:2021cv00174
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN ALEXANDER, MITCHELL, CHIEF COUNSELOR PLAMER and others
Plaintiff:
CAREY ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MATTHEWS et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, WARDEN FORD, UNIT MANAGER RUFUS LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guillory v. Guillory et al
as 2:2021cv00700
Defendant:
Lake Charles Correctional Center, Officer Guillory, Warden Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur John Guillory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYES v. FORD
as 5:2020cv00414
Plaintiff:
ZAKELVIS MAYES
Defendant:
WARDEN FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. FORD
as 5:2020cv00415
Petitioner:
CAREY LECELL ROSS
Respondent:
WARDEN FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Malone v. Wascom et al
as 2:2020cv02776
Defendant:
Warden Spinks, Warden Scott, Warden Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Joey Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
