Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Hennings v. Cartledge et al
as 5:2018cv03295
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Captain Duffy, Warden Larry Cartledge and Correctional Officer Major Early
Plaintiff:
Aljawan Hennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouse v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv02408
Plaintiff:
Devodus Rouse
Defendant:
Warden Larry Cartledge, Dennis Bush and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv02407
Defendant:
Warden Dennis Bush, Warden Larry Cartledge and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Dexter Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karreem Tislam Jabar Wiley v. Warden Larry Cartledge
as 17-7239
Petitioner - Appellant:
KARREEM TISLAM JABAR WILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON
Samuel Whitner v. Larry Cartledge
as 17-7232
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL LAMONT WHITNER, a/k/a Samuel L. Whitner
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Roderick English v. Cpt. Livingstone
as 17-7142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK JEROME ENGLISH
Defendant - Appellee:
CPT. LIVINGSTONE, SGT. WALKER, WARDEN LEWIS and others
Anthony Glover v. State of South Carolina
as 17-6846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DONNELL GLOVER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Alan Duane Rose v. Warden Larry Cartledge
as 17-6792
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN DUANE ROSE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Samuel Lamont Whitner v. Larry Cartledge
as 17-6630
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL LAMONT WHITNER, a/k/a Samuel L. Whitner
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
George Cleveland, III v. Larry Cartledge
as 16-6891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE CLEVELAND, III
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, in their official and individual capacity, OFFICER I. MAYES, in their official and individual capacity, OFFICER M. JONES, in their official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
