Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Roche v. SCI-Mahanoy RHU et al
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
James Roche
Defendant:
SCI-Mahanoy RHU, Department of Correction Facility, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDING v. WARDEN MASON OF SCI MAHANOY et al
as 5:2021cv02393
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYVANIA, WARDEN MASON OF SCI MAHANOY and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON
Petitioner:
JAMES HARDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Price v. Driggers et al
as 5:2020cv01794
Defendant:
Warden Mason, Officer McDuffie and Seargent Driggers
Plaintiff:
Timothy Theotis Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE2)
as 2:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrison
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Joiner v. Warden Mason, et al
as 10-12805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY JOINER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, KENNETH JONES, WARDEN MASON and others
Henry Joiner v. Warden Mason, et al
as 10-11110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY JOINER
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MASON, D. GOULD, CMS Medical Director, DR. SIDDIQ, Physician and others
Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00246
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Bullock County Correctional Facility, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Kenneth Jones, Warden Mason and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Calhoun v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv01027
Plaintiff:
Jeffery W. Calhoun
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Warden Jones, Warden Giles and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Giles v. Jones et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00980
Plaintiff:
Antwoine Giles
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Richard Allen, Dr. Siddiq and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
