Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SAMUELS v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05416
Petitioner:
MILTON SAMUELS
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MILTON v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04983
Petitioner:
SAMUELS MILTON
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLIFFORD v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON, FCI - FT. DIX
as 1:2024cv00870
Petitioner:
STEPHEN FRANCIS CLIFFORD
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON, FCI - FT. DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompkins v. Thompson
as 1:2023cv01356
Petitioner:
Matthew Thompkins
Respondent:
Warden Rachel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parfinim NV v. Tellez
as 1:2022cv05260
Petitioner:
Parfinim NV
Respondent:
Warden Heriberto Tellez and Warden Rachel Thompson
Interested Party:
Aiden Fine Arts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Dang v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Kha Minh Dang
Respondent:
Warden Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kamara v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00018
Petitioner:
Gilbrilla Kamara
Respondent:
Warden Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brown v. Orleans Parish Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2019cv12432
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Sheriff Office, Ronald Serpos, New Orleans Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenup v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2018cv01659
Defendant:
Sgt Bass, Lt Col Cotrell, Col Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Levi G Greenup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Horton v. James Aronald, et al
as 18-30566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ARONALD, DEPUTY WARDEN RACHEL, L. NAIL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
