Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chambers v. Rice et al
as 3:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Stafford L. Chambers
Defendant:
Ray Rice, Hedges Portillio, Donald Jacksons and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Lars et al
as 3:2019cv00481
Defendant:
Unknown Moore, MTC, Sgt. Lars and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Max Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2013cv00738
Plaintiff:
Martin Caldwell
Defendant:
Warden Shaw and L. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Johnson v. Dale Caskey, et al
as 13-60567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN DALE CASKEY, WARDEN BART GRIMES, WARDEN R. GILLESPIE and others
Blackwell v. Thaler, et al
as 6:2013cv00069
Petitioner:
Christopher Blackwell
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Warden Shaw and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackwell v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID et al
as 6:2013cv00122
Petitioner:
Christopher Blackwell
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID and Warden Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levy v. Shaw
as 6:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Lee Levy
Defendant:
Warden Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden Shaw et al
as 6:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dominic Williams
Defendant:
Warden Shaw, Chief Jackson, CO Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shatner v. Randel et al
as 1:2009cv03812
Plaintiff:
Darrin Shatner
Defendant:
Director Randel, Director Walker, Deputy Director Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Mason et al
as 1:2008cv02820
Plaintiff:
Mervin Moore
Defendant:
M. Mason, Department of Corrections and Warden Shaw
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
