Cases 1 - 10 of 521
DePriest v. Andes
as 24-2261
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEPRIEST
Respondent:
CHANCE ANDES, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Wilson v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-1818
Petitioner:
LUKE NOEL WILSON
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Avenal State Prison and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Van Druten v. McDowell
as 24-1800
Petitioner:
JOHN JAMES VAN DRUTEN
Respondent:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Ironwood State Prison
Alvarez v. Warden, et al
as 4:2024cv01462
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility "B" Yard, Warden, California Institution for Men "A" Yard, Warden, Corcoran State Prison "3B" and "4B" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Marcus Terrell v. Warden Dooly State Prison, et al
as 24-10577
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN DOOLY STATE PRISON, PAUL, LUCAS and others
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant:
CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Gabriel Balderas v. Warden, Corcoran State Prison
as 2:2024cv00595
Petitioner:
Gabriel Balderas
Respondent:
Warden, Corcoran State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Willis v. Warden Valdosta State Prison
as 23-13897
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY LESTER WILLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Etienne v. Edmark
as 23-1946
Petitioner / Appellant:
DICKENS ETIENNE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, NH State Prison
Jerome Coast, Jr. v. Michael Hartmeyer, et al
as 23-13502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME COAST, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HARTMEYER, WARDEN SMITH STATE PRISON, JACKSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
