Cases 1 - 10 of 527
Smith v. Warden, Montana State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Defendant:
Warden, Montana State Prison and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Wesley J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeMocker v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-4984
Respondent:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, JEFF VAN WINKLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Florence and STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, Arizona State Prison-Eyman Complex
Petitioner:
STEVEN CARROLL DEMOCKER
John Schoolcraft v. Warden, Georgia State Prison
as 24-12342
Petitioner:
JOHN THOMAS SCHOOLCRAFT
Respondent:
WARDEN, GEORGIA STATE PRISON
Acosta Hurtado v. McDowell
as 24-3962
Petitioner:
ELEAZAR ACOSTA HURTADO
Respondent:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Ironwood State Prison
(PC) Ruth v. Warden, Valley State Prison
as 1:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Eber G Ruth
Defendant:
Warden, Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3527
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAVID ELLISON
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and JAMES O'NEIL, Warden - Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
DePriest v. Andes
as 24-2261
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEPRIEST
Respondent:
CHANCE ANDES, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Van Druten v. McDowell
as 24-1800
Petitioner:
JOHN JAMES VAN DRUTEN
Respondent:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Ironwood State Prison
Wilson v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-1818
Petitioner:
LUKE NOEL WILSON
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Avenal State Prison and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Alvarez v. Warden, et al
as 4:2024cv01462
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility "B" Yard, Warden, California Institution for Men "A" Yard, Warden, Corcoran State Prison "3B" and "4B" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
