Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Emma Jean Anderson v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02160
Petitioner: Emma Jean Anderson, Terry Abbott, John Robert Allman and others
Respondent: Islamic Republic of Iran and National Iranian Oil Corporation
Interested Party: Oaktree Capital Management, LP and Oaktree Capital Management LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Williams v. Epic Security Corp
as 19-652
Plaintiff: Aronalph Henriques, Avinaash Takdari, Elizabeth Cruz and others
Defendant / Appellant: Epic Security Corp
Defendant: Selwyn Falk
Plaintiff / Appellee: Warren Richardson, Sharon Carr, Jose Vicent and others
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 18-1851
Plaintiff: ABC
Plaintiff / Appellee: Claudine Dunningan, Deborah D. Peterson, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), Terry Abbott and others
Respondent / Appellee: David Kirschenbaum, Isabelle Kirschenbaum, Jason Kirschenbaum and others
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 18-1851
Plaintiff: ABC
Plaintiff - Appellee: Claudine Dunningan, Deborah D. Peterson, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), Terry Abbott and others
Respondent - Appellee: David Kirschenbaum, Isabelle Kirschenbaum, Jason Kirschenbaum and others
Movant - Appellant: Jay Glenn
Third-Party-Defendant: Ellen Marie Bomer, Alexandra Cormier, Tabitha Carter and others
Cross-Defendant: Andres Alvarado Tull, Patty Barnett, Elaine Allen and others
Defendant - Appellee: Estate of Michael Heiser, Gary Heiser, Francis Heiser and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran, William Adams, Citibank, N.A. and others
Edmond Warren Richardson v. Ron Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00223
Respondent: Ron Davis
Petitioner: Edmond Warren Richardson
Richardson v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00471
Petitioner: Edmond Warren Richardson
Respondent: Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv04796
Petitioner: Edmond Warren Richardson
Respondent: Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 13-3952
Plaintiff / Appellee: Susan Ciupaska, Theresa Desjardins, Randal D. Olson and others
Cross Defendant: Estate of Rogath Saidi Saidi, Johnny Melendez, Jr., Edwine Valentine Mathe Katunda and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Estate of Eric Walker, Estate of Billy San Pedro, Douglas Pontillo and others
Appellee: Estate of Millard D. Campbell, Marie R. Campbell, Alan Hayman and others
Defendant / Appellee: Geraldo Alvarado, Johnny Thompson, Eloise F. Selbe and others
Defendant / Appellant: Bank Markazi, the Central Bank of Iran
Respondent / Appellee: Estelle Carroll, Phyllis Maisel and Harry Beer
Defendant: Banca UBAE SpA, Clearstream Banking, S.A. and Leonard Paul Tice
Not Yet Classified: Timothy Giblin
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 13-3952
Plaintiff - Appellee: Claudine Dunningan, ABC, Deborah D. Peterson, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple and others
Respondent - Appellee: David Kirschenbaum, Isabelle Kirschenbaum, Jason Kirschenbaum and others
Petitioner-Defendant - Appellee: Timothy Giblin
Third-Party-Defendant: Gary Robert Owens, James Owens, Frank B. Pressley, Jr. and others
Cross-Defendant: Andres Alvarado Tull, Minerva Alvarado, Alan C. Anderson and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran, Citibank, N.A., Leonard Paul Tice and others
Defendant - Appellee: William Adams, Catherine Adams, Kendall K. Kitson, Jr. and others
Appellee: Carlos Acosta, Maria Acosta, Estate of Judith Greenbaum and others
Defendant - Appellant: Bank Markazi, the Central Bank of Iran, Clearstream Banking, S.A. and Banca UBAE SpA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?