Cases 1 - 10 of 512
Alvin Washington v. Bregman, et al
as 24-1666
Plaintiff:
ALVIN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER BREGMAN and SGT. F. MCCLELLAN
DAVIS v. WASHINGTON D.C. COMMONWEALTHS et al
as 1:2024cv04758
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON D.C. COMMONWEALTHS, APPELLATE COURT TRENTON SHERIFFS, REPUBLICS IMMIGRANTS PROSECUTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORSCH v. CANTYMAGLI et al
as 2:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAY HORSCH
Defendant:
JOSEPH CANTYMAGLI and TIFFANY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Benney v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1436
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN BENNEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Jerome Washington v. Link, et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LINK, SCI Graterford, Superintendent, VOORHEES, CO, PETTERS, III, SCI Graterford, SGT. and others
Robert Washington v. South Woods State Prison, et al
as 24-1245
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Obataiya Scott v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
OBATAIYA SCOTT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Chandhok v. Washington
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Angad Singh Chandhok
Respondent:
M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chandhok v. Washington
as 4:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Angad Singh Chandhok
Respondent:
Warden M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jerome Washington v. Weber
as 23-3260
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MR. WEBER, Psychiatrist/SCI Rockview/Correctional Vendor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
