Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Salanoa v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05126
Plaintiff:
Muelu Salanoa, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Deacon Construction LLC
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Diana Watson
Defendant:
Deacon Construction LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
PacifiCorp v. Watson
as 3:2023cv06155
Plaintiff:
PacifiCorp
Defendant:
Laura Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter-Shabazz v. Pierce County Council et al
as 3:2023cv06045
Plaintiff:
Mumit Xh Carter-Shabazz
Defendant:
Pierce County Council, NaphCare, Patty Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson et al v. Kurtz et al
as 3:2023cv05870
Plaintiff:
Eric A Watson, Sarah M Watson, Lisa Marie Kurtz and others
Defendant:
David A Kurtz, Lisa Kurtz and David Kurtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Al-Bustani v. Alger et al
as 3:2022cv05238
Defendant:
Kay Stone, Sean B Alger, Steve Outtrim and others
Plaintiff:
Al-Hareth Al-Albustani and Al-Hareth Al-Bustani
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Rozier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05724
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Rozier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bungie Inc v. Fisher et al
as 2:2023cv01143
Defendant:
Jacob Mahuron, Matthew Abbott, David Hastings and others
Plaintiff:
Bungie, Inc. and Bungie Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
