Cases 31 - 40 of 147
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00885
Plaintiff:
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and Panion & BF Biotech, Inc.
Defendant:
Watson Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Watson v. Does
as 1:2019cv00551
Plaintiff:
David M. Watson
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00396
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00369
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Inc., Actavis Pharma Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Watson v. Harewood et al
as 1:2018cv01062
Defendant:
Matthew Woffend, Carlia Miller, Meticen and others
Plaintiff:
Leo N. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00880
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ann Watson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Amgen Inc. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01807
Plaintiff:
Amgen Inc.
Defendant:
Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Actavis Pharma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Watson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv01197
Petitioner:
Nakeem Watson
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Steven Wesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
