Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
De'Vontay Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Vencini Smith, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Brian K Rice
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Kenneth Boswell, Ray L Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
De'Vontay Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Vencini Smith, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Education Amendments of 1972
Gaddis v. Benoit et al
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Pam Benoit, Ray Watts and Toni Rhodes Leeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dees v. Peters et al
as 5:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Defendant:
K. Peters, Morgan, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Linda Watts
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
